The List

3 Times That Big Brands Used Songs Illegally and Got Sued for It

Musicians have been battling brands for years over stolen music, artwork, concepts, and more that brands have used for their marketing campaigns. Nowadays, it seems like big businesses can get away with just about anything. Thatโ€™s what these three major brands thought when they illegally used a musicianโ€™s music (or, rather, โ€œsound-alikesโ€) for promotional purposes. Luckily, those musicians in question didnโ€™t back down when it came to getting their due diligence. Letโ€™s look at three times big brands used songs in their ads illegally and got sued for it.

1. Chiliโ€™s vs. Beastie Boys

This more recent example of brands that used songs illegally and were sued involves restaurant chain Chiliโ€™s and famed hip-hop outfit Beastie Boys.ย 

Videos by American Songwriter

Beastie Boys sued Briker International over the use of their 1994 smash hit song โ€œSabotageโ€, as well as the bandโ€™s likeness, for a commercial. The ad in question was a parody of the original songโ€™s music video. The rap group accused the brand of implying (quite falsely) that Beastie Boys were endorsing Chiliโ€™s. The suit is still ongoing, but itโ€™s quite likely that the Boys will get a paycheck over it.

2. Ford Motors vs. Bette Midler

Decades ago, Ford Motor Co. hired a former backup singer of Bette Middlerโ€™s to record a song for a car commercial. However, they only did so after Midler shot down an offer to do the commercial. They went out of their way to ask the singer to โ€œmimicโ€ Midler as much as possible, so listeners would think it was the infamous Bette Midler singing. Naturally, the OG Midler sued and won $400,000.

3. Frito-Lay vs. Tom Waits

Gravelly-voiced jazz-folk legend Tom Waits once sued Frito-Lay in the 1980s over a Doritos commercial. The brand used a parody song that was clearly inspired by Waitsโ€™ โ€œStep Right Upโ€, and even featured a singer who sounded extremely similar to him. The ad was everywhere, and eventually, Waits heard it himself. The sound-alike was so similar to him that he thought he might have recorded the ad while he was drunk and simply forgot. He sued the company and was awarded almost $3 million in damages.

Photo by Jean-Baptiste Mondino, courtesy of ANTI- Records

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.