Features

George Harrison Struggled To Write Again After This Serious Legal Trouble

Part of the reason why George Harrison pursued a more obscure creative career post-Beatles had to do with his general temperament (he was the โ€œQuiet Beatle,โ€ after all), but another likely explanation was that the former Beatle struggled to write again after his 1970 song โ€œMy Sweet Lordโ€ landed the musician in serious legal trouble. The landmark ruling against Harrison had long-lasting implications for the music industry as a whole.

But on a personal level, the expensive, years-long drama left Harrison feeling paranoid, unsure how to return to his craft without repeating his same โ€œmistake.โ€ After the court charged Harrison for committing a crime โ€œsubconsciously,โ€ we canโ€™t say we blame him for his attitude following the trial.

Videos by American Songwriter

The Lengthy Story Behind George Harrisonโ€™s Serious Legal Trouble

George Harrison released โ€œMy Sweet Lordโ€ on his triple album, All Things Must Pass, in November 1970. Just a few months later, Harrison was likely repeating that album title to himself as a motivational mantra to get through what would become a years-long, incredibly expensive lawsuit against the former Beatle. It all started in February 1971 when Bright Music Corporation sued Harrison for copyright infringement. โ€œMy Sweet Lord,โ€ the corporation argued, sounded eerily similar to the Chiffonsโ€™ โ€œHeโ€™s So Fine.โ€

Songwriter Ronnie Mackโ€™s estate was the original driving force behind the lawsuit, something financial representative Allen Klein fought against on Harrisonโ€™s behalf. Eventually, Bright Music Corporation, Mackโ€™s publisher, filed for bankruptcy. That might have been the end of the entire snafu had Harrison and Klein not had an acrimonious split years later. Suddenly, Klein switched sides, serving as a consultant for Bright Music Corporation and reviving the copyright infringement lawsuit against Harrison.

The case went to court in February 1976, five years after the initial filing. Presiding Judge Richard Owen, who was a classical musician himself, ruled that Harrison had copied the Chiffonsโ€™ โ€œHeโ€™s So Fine,โ€ albeit subconsciously. โ€œDid Harrison deliberately use the music of โ€œHeโ€™s So Fineโ€? I do not believe so,โ€ Owens later wrote. โ€œNevertheless, it is clear that โ€œMy Sweet Lordโ€ is the very same song as โ€œHeโ€™s So Fineโ€ with different words, and Harrison had access to โ€œHeโ€™s So Fine.โ€ This is, under the law, infringement of copyright, and is no less so even though subconsciously accomplished.โ€

The Musician Said The Experience Made It Difficult To Write

The ruling on Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music had long-lasting implications for the music industry. But on a personal level, it also deeply perturbed George Harrisonโ€™s connection to the songwriting craft that had propelled him to this level of celebrity in the first place. After all, if he committed a crime subconsciously, who was to say he wouldnโ€™t commit another without realizing it?

โ€œItโ€™s difficult to start writing again after youโ€™ve been through that,โ€ Harrison admitted in a 1979 interview with Rolling Stone. โ€œEven now, when I put the radio on, every tune I hear sounds like something else. But most of the lawsuits are gone. Now weโ€™re gearing up for the next batch.โ€ This โ€œnext batch,โ€ he explained, had to do with the Beatles (or, more specifically, the entity representing the Beatles) suing other artists for copyright infringement. โ€œThereโ€™s not much more we [the Beatles] can be sued for, but we can sue a lot of other people,โ€ Harrison told the magazine.

Although most of the dust had settled by the time Harrison spoke with Rolling Stone in 1979, the lawsuit was still fresh in everyoneโ€™s minds in the years afterโ€”including the mind of Harrisonโ€™s former bandmate, John Lennon. In one of his final interviews before his death, Lennon told Playboy that Harrison had โ€œwalked right intoโ€ his legal trouble. โ€œHe knew what he was doing.โ€

โ€œHe must have known, you know,โ€ Lennon continued. โ€œHeโ€™s smarter than that. Itโ€™s irrelevant, actuallyโ€ฆonly on a monetary level does it matter. He could have changed a couple of bars in that song, and nobody could ever have touched him, but he just let it go and paid the price. Maybe he thought God would just sort of let him off.โ€

Photo by Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images