Features

I Have Weird Feelings About New Tech That Lets Jerry Garcia Read to You

As the creative functions of artificial intelligence continue to expand and evolve, weโ€™re finding more and more ways to reconnect with long-lost musiciansโ€”and as of November 2024, that includes the ability to have Grateful Dead founder and guitarist Jerry Garcia read books, articles, poetry, and PDFs to you.

AI technology in the creative world is nothing new. Artists use artificial intelligence to create album covers, incorporate dead musicians into live performances, create musical collaborations that never happened, and more. As a musical artist myself, all of these developments have given me an uneasy feeling about the impending doom, er, future, of art consumption.

Videos by American Songwriter

But something about imagining Jerry Garciaโ€™s disembodied voice reading the latest, hottest audiobook to someone via their smartphone just made the pit in my stomach grow ten times its usual size.

Jerry Garcia Can Now Read To You via AI

Nearly three decades after Grateful Dead founder and guitar icon Jerry Garcia died, his estate partnered with Eleven Labs to recreate the late musicianโ€™s voice using artificial intelligence. Through Eleven Labsโ€™ ElevenReader app, users can have an AI-generated Garcia read them anything from audiobooks to PDFs to articles to poetry in up to 32 different languages.

โ€œBy bringing voices like Jerry Garcia to our platform, weโ€™re not just enhancing our appโ€”weโ€™re creating new ways for people to experience content,โ€ Dustin Blank of ElevenLabs told Billboard, per Variety. โ€œThis project has been a labor of love. We couldnโ€™t be happier with how Jerryโ€™s voice has been recreated. Itโ€™s a beautiful thing to bring his sound to life again for both longtime fans and a new generation of listeners.โ€

Garciaโ€™s voice is one of many that AI has โ€œbrought back from the dead.โ€ From Judy Garland to Sir Laurence Olivier to Tupac to Michael Jackson, the tech side of the art industry has been looking for ways to bring artists from the past into the present using various AI-generated techniques. But if youโ€™ll forgive the Jurassic Park reference, is this another one of those instances where โ€œscientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didnโ€™t stop to think if they should?โ€

Maybe We Should Let Dead Artistsโ€ฆStay Dead?

Thereโ€™s no denying the scientific feat of bringing dead artists, musicians, and other public figures back from the grave via artificial intelligence. Just imagine telling someone from 1985 that this would one day be a common practice. Theyโ€™d likely look at you like you were bonkers, and could you blame them? Itโ€™s an impressive accomplishment. But from an artistโ€™s perspective, I wonder if itโ€™s one we should continue pursuing after realizing we could.

Beyond the potential safety concerns of increasingly convincingโ€”but still fakeโ€”AI content, there is somethingโ€ฆsacrilegeโ€ฆabout bringing these public figures back from the dead. Jerry Garcia pre-recording a collection of books before his 1995 death and his estate releasing them decades later is one thing. Having him read you a PDF of, letโ€™s say, a microwave ownerโ€™s manual just seems gratuitous and unnecessary. If listening to Jerry Garciaโ€™s voice is something you feel like doing, why not do it in the way that he originally intendedโ€”through his music? Why must we pull his sonic likeness from the ether so he can read you the Harry Potter series, too?

As more and more aging artists realize that their legacy is at risk of becoming immortalized through AI, some are outright requesting that their likeness isnโ€™t used after theyโ€™re gone. Garcia, of course, never got that same privilege. Maybe we should be giving him (and other artists who died before AI became a reality) the benefit of the doubt that they might not be okay with it, either?

Photo by Clayton Call/Redferns