Unless youโre a Beatles aficionado (and/or saw Peter Jacksonโs revealing documentary miniseries, The Beatles: Get Back), you would never be able to pick up on the deep tensions between John Lennon and Paul McCartney that were reaching a fever pitch during the Let It Be and Abbey Road sessions, which would make up the two final Beatles albums. On either record, from a surface-level vantage point, the band was as cohesive and creative as ever.
But dig a little deeper, and the fractures breaking the Fab Four apart become more apparent. The bandโs reactions and recollections in later interviews shone a light on the dissonance that was slowly increasing in volume as they barrelled toward their final goodbye as one of the worldโs most pervasive and influential rock bands.
Videos by American Songwriter
Two songs on Let It Be, the final album the band released despite starting its sessions prior to Abbey Road, highlight the mounting conflict between the bandโs primary songwriters.
John Lennon Had Harsh Words For These Beatles Songs Off Their Final Album
Generally speaking, the songwriting partnership of John Lennon and Paul McCartney is what made the Beatles so prolific and unique. When their relationship began faltering, so did everything else. The final recording sessions were full of fights, clashing egos, and the occasional walkout. Even years after Let It Be came out, the musicians could recall with cutting clarity the parts they did and didnโt like about the recording process (and the songs themselves).
For example, in one of his final interviews before his death, Lennon told David Sheff that he never thought the title track to Let It Be sounded like a true Beatles song. Despite the songwriting credit going to Lennon and McCartney, the former Beatle said the song was the latter’s. โWhat can you say?โ Lennon mused to Sheff. โNothing to do with the Beatles. It couldโve been Wings. I think it was inspired by โBridge Over Troubled Waters.โ Thatโs my feeling, although I have nothing to go on.โ
Lennon had more accusatory assumptions about another song on the album, โGet Back.โ Describing it as a โpotboiler rewriteโ of their previous track, โLady Madonna,โ Lennon suggested there was somethingโeven subconsciouslyโabout his wife, Yoko Ono, in the song. โYou know, get back to where you once belonged,โ Lennon argued. โEvery time he sang the line in the studio, heโd look at Yoko. Maybe heโll say Iโm paranoid. He can say, โIโm a normal family man. Those two are freaks.โ Thatโll leave him a chance to say that one.โ
Paul McCartney Refuted His Song Meanings Multiple Times
John Lennon wasnโt the only one who lobbed cynical hypotheses toward Paul McCartneyโs contributions to the Beatlesโ final album. While his bandmate might have believed โLet It Beโ had โnothing to do with the Beatles,โ one could argue it had everything to do with the Fab Four. McCartney wrote the title track during a โvery difficult period,โ as he explained in Barry Milesโ Many Years From Now. โThe breakup of the Beatles was looming, and I was very nervy.โ
McCartney said that during this time, when the โdrugs, stress, [and] tirednessโ of everything was starting to break him down, his late mother, Mary, visited him in a dream. โIt was so wonderful for me, and she was very reassuring. In the dream, she said, โItโll be alright.โ Iโm not sure if she used the words, โlet it be.โ But that was the gist of her advice. It was such a sweet dream, I woke up thinking, โOh, it was really great to visit with her again. I felt very blessed.โ
Similarly, McCartneyโs recounting of โGet Backโ refutes Lennonโs assumptions it was about Yoko Ono. The song was originally a satire of British politicians denouncing immigrants. But as can sometimes be the case in satire, the listeners didnโt pick up on the joke and thought McCartneyโs lyrics were serious. โThe words were not racist at all,โ he argued. โThey were anti-racist. If there was any group that was not racist, it was the Beatles.โ
Photo by ITV/Shutterstock








